Hey everyone, interesting collection of readings this week. I've posted a series of questions below. See you all Monday.
Both Popp (2011) and Goss (1995) describe technological
“advances”—or at least systematizations that are deemed to be advances—in the
advertising industry. In Goss, there is a concern about whether geotargeting
may be an invasion of privacy as well as whether such tools will even be all
that effective (although here, the problem may be more in terms of the unit of
analysis than the method itself). Popp doesn’t express much concern about
checking departments, although there is an implied skepticism about their role;
they were intended, he argues, to signify an edifice of scientific
professionalism, perhaps to compensate for the leap-of-faith nature of advertising’s
general effectiveness. Digital technology has further improved advertisers’
ability to selectively target and personalize ads as well as track exactly how
many readers/viewers were exposed (a considerably trickier problem than just
checking that ads were indeed printed). These technological changes have meant
a lot in terms of the sales pitch for advertisers to their clients, but is
there a saturation point where we reach a creepiness threshold of Minority
Report-style customized advertising to which consumers will respond negatively?
Are we there yet? Likewise, might an over-segmenting of the consumer population
lead to the end of mass culture? Are there consequences for civil society if we
have fewer shared cultural (consumption) experiences?
The two readings about print-laden urban life—signage and
other posted printed materials that aid in the navigation of cities and impart
a richness to the urban culture experience—has me thinking a lot about the
future of this sort of thing. We seem to be on the cusp of large scale adoption
of “augmented reality” technologies—for instance, Google Glass, but also in many
ways, internet-enabled mobile devices in conjunction with sites like Yelp and
Foursquare are already upending some of the conventional ways businesses
attract customers and attention in their local communities. Maintaining and
disseminating a virtual presence is often as important (if not more) than a
business’s own physical signage, and increasingly the two are converging in
some interesting ways. Presumably signs and other printed materials are not
going away entirely, but where do we see the future taking us? What potential
concerns (marketing discrimination as Turow describes?) may arise as businesses
are able to adopt virtual signage that perhaps selectively targets and appeals
to customers spotted nearby?
Finally, the Turow reading and the Wimberley and McClean
article on information-seeking consumers in the grocery industry further emphasized
the trend toward customized shopping experiences. One question I was left with
after reading both articles is where these trends in data-mining and analytics
leave small businesses? While large conglomerates like Walmart are able to take
advantage of these new technologies, are we going to reach a point where these
tools are accessible even to the average family-run restaurant or coffee shop?
Also on the consumer side, it’s probably important to note the ease with which
customers can now comparison shop, scanning barcodes on their phones, making
people that much more aware of the actual price instead of the psychological
price. Will this further empower the Walmarts of the world that have advantages
when it comes to competing solely on price?
Additionally, I’m curious how people feel about extensive
use of marketing discrimination as Turow describes it. Is this different than
charging people different prices for the same products—typically wealthier
people receiving better deals because they spend more in total? Is this fair?
What can be done about it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.