Overall after doing these readings one question that struck
me is that several of the articles talked about the new media consumer
expecting to read their news from an aggregator of some sort (I currently use
Flipboard to consolidate many of my daily news readings). Many news sources and
aggregators tend to tailor the news you receive (If every article I read
concerns increasing gun control, many aggregators begin to push those types of
articles to the top, and will tend to bury anything with an opposing view).
What effect is this going to have on the public? Do most of the public even
know this is happening? I tend to think it makes for a less educated and more polarized
public. Do you agree? What are other possible benefits and pitfalls of
aggregated news tailoring?
Will having less gate keeping in new media allow for more
information to be available to those that are interested in topics in the “long
tail” or those with minority views? Or will people with minority views feel
intimidated by the avalanche of opposing viewpoints seen in comments sections
and feel that they need to conform to the masses or keep their opinions to
themselves?
In Free Speech and
Anonymity the author states that older forms of reader participation (letters
to the editor, etc) were all screened by a gatekeeper, and in some cases edited
for grammar and length. Do you think it would ever be possible for online news
forums to recreate this gatekeeper function for online comments given the
volume of comments generated? And would this increase the value of those news
sites?
In What we Need from
the Next Journalism the author states some of the values of professional
journalism include “independence, verification, a primary allegiance to
citizens rather than political faction or corporate interests, and a dedication
to consideration of events, rather than a commitment to forcing a specific
outcome or policy solution.” How can new media models use new technology to
improve on the legacy models of journalism’s ability to meet these goals? The
author also states that transparency is the way the organization creates
credibility. How can new media use technology to increase their transparency?
Do you agree with the assertion in the Fallows article that
Google depends on quality reporting? Is it true that Google will have less to
report if “quality” journalism declines?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.