In this chapter from The
Late of Age Print: Everyday Book Culture from Consumerism to Control (2009),
Ted Striphas emphasizes the materiality of books and issues of control within
the writing-publishing-distribution-reading life cycle of a book. His analysis
shifts away from questions of authorship or the literary form of books and
instead focuses on “the history and social function” of books and e-books (p.
22), most notably problems of ownership and circulation. Central to his study
is the American commercial publishing industry, for whom books are commodity
objects first and sources of knowledge or creativity only a distant second. He
comes to the conclusion that what is changing most with the emergence of e-books
and related digital technologies is “the social relations of commodity
ownership,” which are today being dominated by new practices of “controlled
consumption” (p. 45), wherein publishers micromanage the use and circulation of
content through copyright law and technologies like digital rights management
software. In other words, what is changing most in terms of printed books is
not the content itself or the formal or experiential qualities of reading – those
seem to be relatively consistent, even if the way that content is accessed is
much different – but rather what the reader/consumer/user can do with that
content after purchasing it. This equates to not just technological but also
social control.
To make this argument, Striphas outlines trends in the sale,
purchase, and display of books as they developed throughout the 20th
century. He maps out a paradox that has emerged wherein publishers need to
promote books and book ownership while also controlling the reproduction and
circulation of book content following the initial sale. Much of his emphasis is
placed on the cultural status of the book and how in the 1920s and 1930s books
were turned into mass-market consumer items through endorsements of the
importance of books by prominent public figures and, most notably, the
promotion of bookshelves in the middle-class home. These trends encouraged the
accumulation of books, but Striphas notes that what they really nurtured was a
new type of professional middle-class identity defined through consumerism – it
was the form of books that was being promoted (i.e. books as status objects),
not their literariness (i.e. the content of books). Nevertheless, as book
ownership spread, the publishing industry was faced with the problems of piracy
and unauthorized sharing via photocopying, resale, library lending, or
consumers simply circulating books among friends and family. Through a mix of
government policy and legal actions, the industry began from the 1970s onward
to change the definition of ownership from something that was unrestricted to
something that afforded only specific uses and, more and more, lasted for a
limited time and was confined to an individual consumer.
I find this chapter to be a compelling analysis of the
cultural value and social function of books as a form of material culture. I
particularly like the emphasis on conflict and contradiction. Through the
central concepts of property and possession, though, the legal and economic
factors can at times seem too deterministic. As much as Striphas emphasizes the
importance of social elements and the key role of consumers in these processes,
these consumers remain relatively ambiguous and lacking agency. I’d be curious
to hear more about the ways in which consumers have resisted things like
digital rights management technologies in an effort to retain fuller
flexibility and control over the e-books they purchase. This includes consumer
movements, such as that which got Apple to abandon DRM for its iTunes music store,
as well as hacks to circumvent DRM.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.