Priego’s article focuses on the changing nature of comics in
the digital age, defining what “comics” is and is not at a time when the form
is in some ways evolving (are graphic novels comics? how do digital
technologies change the nature of comics and the production processes involved
in creating them?). Much of the article is explanatory, laying out some of
these debates and the (nascent) interdisciplinary scholarship that has
developed around the topic. If there is a thesis that runs through the text it
is Priego’s point that scholars must be aware “of the relationship between
process and product” or the ways that “methods of production and types of
publication” can affect the final product and its historical development—as
well as the ways in which we study these concepts.
Priego’s other point concerns technological determinism and
the non-linear manner in which technology evolves and shapes the media
landscape. Furthermore, Priego contends that his scholarship on the topic of
comics, is subject to an inherent historical bias in that it “seeks to provide
insights into the nature of comics based on the previous history of comics and
comics scholarship.” I wish Priego had provided a few more concrete examples of
what he means here, but if I understand his point properly, it is that the
study of print media tends to be concerned primarily with those features
associated with print form and the digital form in contrast to it, rather than
approaching new forms in an unbiased manner.
It’s a helpful insight that extends more broadly beyond the
discussion of comics themselves. In particular, Priego’s article resonates with
respect to our conversation this week about the fate of for-profit newspapers,
many of which have created online analogues of their products that differ in
only minor ways from the printed versions. A few papers, the NYT, the WSJ, and
others are only beginning to approach the new medium with fresh eyes,
exploiting in a fuller manner some of the other storytelling features (video,
interactivity) allowed by the web. In addition to all of the economic burdens
explored by some of the other authors this week, newspaper publishers also
suffer from some of the same historical biases Priego identifies with respect
to scholarship on comics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.